The New York Times article quotes Scott Winship of the American Enterprise Institute, who participated in an Schooling Subsequent discussion board, “Ought to Congress Make the Expanded Youngster Tax Credit score Everlasting?” within the Fall 2021 difficulty.
The Instances article says, “Whereas supporters hoped the credit score would increase instructional or enrichment spending, a examine that posed the query straight discovered it had not.” It’s certainly correct that there have been hopes the credit score would increase instructional or enrichment spending; Frederick Hess, in “How a Turbocharged Youngster Tax Credit score Might Electrify College Alternative,” (Fall 2021) instructed that states may supply to match the cash if it had been spent on training.
The New York Metropolis-based examine linked to by the Instances article however, the newspaper does interview one mom who withdrew her 12-year-old daughter from a cheerleading class “partially due to the fee” when the tax credit score expired. And a Middle on Finances and Coverage Priorities evaluation of Census Bureau knowledge discovered 40 p.c of low-income households had been utilizing the kid tax credit score cash for training prices masking books and provides, tuition, after-school packages, and transportation for college, as Schooling Subsequent reported in November 2021.
The web headline the Instances placed on its article—“The Expanded Youngster Tax Credit score Is Gone. The Battle Over It Stays”—is definitely correct.